Being a transplant of the great white north to the proud state of Alabama, I was thrilled when the state's first Dunkin Donuts opened about two miles from my office. We have a couple of Starbucks close by, but until about a year ago we were painfully without Dunkin. For those of you outside of the United States, in our country the Dunkin vs. Starbucks question has become sort of a cultural litmus test based on the true fuel of American innovation: coffee. An order at Dunkin usually reads along the lines of "Large Coffee, Black."
Starbucks, of course, is famous for its ability to build drinks more complex than non linear algebra containing contributing ingredients from more countries than the international space station. A Starbucks order must be at least 18 syllables and run along the lines of "Venti half soy, half 1 percent, cream mocha vanilla latte with splenda, add a split quad shot with whip and caramel. Extra Hot."
To Dunkin fans theirs is the choice is one of simplicity - of getting the job done with no bells or whistles. To them, a Starbucks coffee is complex for complexity's sake, and contains unnecessary ingredients that do little to advance the coffee drinking experience but increase cost and obfuscate any attempt to understand one another's drink orders. Its customers are pretentious at best, and quite possibly un-American at worst.
To Starbucks drinkers, theirs is the more evolved palate. Their orders simply cannot be appreciated by the cretins of DD, who they will not rule out as a potential lower life form stuck in a rigid coffee drinking pattern and unable to adapt to change should the need arise.
So which group of loyal customers is right and which is wrong? Of course this a question that can't be answered - there are simply too many variables, too many circumstances, and too many considerations of personal taste.